Tel: 01992 471001

Email: hoddesdon@ashbourneinsurance.co.uk

Insurers Win Fictitious Car Crash Case – Mother Jailed For Bogus Claim In Landmark High Court Ruling

A mother who filed a false insurance claim for whiplash suffered in a completely fictitious car crash was jailed at the High Court today in the first case of its kind.

In a landmark ruling for the insurance industry, a top judge said the courts had a duty to clamp down on the prevalent fraud which was driving up premiums for everyone.

Insurers have brought contempt proceedings against claimants for exaggerating their injuries before, but this was the first time anyone has been brought before the High Court for a completely invented accident.

Samina Bashir, 28, of Navigation Street, Birmingham, admitted making the bogus claim for damages having originally claimed she was involved in a three-car crash that never happened.

Her partner Faisal Rauf has also been imprisoned for backing up her claim.

Insurer LV= demanded that the couple be jailed for contempt of court after the truth emerged about the “accident” – which could have cost up to £75,000 in payouts.

Two senior judges handed the pair six-week sentences, saying they hoped the “clang of the prison gates” would deter the “rampant dishonesty” of false insurance claims which has been blighting Britain.

Sir John Thomas, sitting with Mr Justice Silber, said: “It is conduct which must be deterred because it strikes at the very heart of our system of justice, and does great damage to every citizen who has an insurance policy.”

Ms Bashir’s parents, Kaneez Akhtar and Mohammed Bashir, of Littleton Road, Birmingham, were spared prison but given six-week sentences, suspended for one year, for their admitted part in the fraud.

The court heard that the family falsely claimed that Ms Bashir was driving her partner and parents in a Rover which was hit by a BMW in Handsworth, Birmingham, on January 6, 2008, knocking it into a Peugeot.

Ms Bashir claimed more than £5,000 compensation for the whiplash she faked, and insurers had to set aside up to £75,000 for other expected claims.

But when it emerged that the family had connections to those supposedly driving the other vehicles, insurers launched an investigation.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent blogs

  • When you become the broker!

    There is no doubting the fact that increased accessibility to insurance on-line has generated a more competitive paying field for the insurance …

    Peter Smits
  • One size does not fit all!

    The core message at the centre of consumer advertising for insurance, particularly motor and home, from those household brands, you know the …

    Peter Smits
  • Don’t be left stranded…

    Ever stopped to wonder if your insurance policy purchased on-line is “fit-for-purpose”?
    Of course the schedule of insurance will include all the usual …

    Peter Smits
  • Archives

  • Calendar

    October 2019
    M T W T F S S
    « Aug    
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.